<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Danny McPherson &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Danny McPherson on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2013, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2012-12-27T11:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> IPv6 Presents a Security Paradox for the Network (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121227_ipv6_presents_a_security_paradox_for_the_network</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121227_ipv6_presents_a_security_paradox_for_the_network</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The capabilities IPv6 provides will enhance online security, but the shift to the new Internet address scheme may also present risks if not properly managed. Previously, Internet security was largely an after-thought for the early Internet, as its primary purpose was to facilitate open, end-to-end, any-to-any communications and information exchange for bridging and accelerating research efforts. Today, we have a much more complex online ecosystem that spans billions of users across the globe and serves not only as an engine for e-commerce, but as an engine for all commerce. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121227_ipv6_presents_a_security_paradox_for_the_network">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2012-12-27T11:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> 8 Security Considerations for IPv6 Deployment (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/8_security_considerations_for_ipv6_deployment</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/8_security_considerations_for_ipv6_deployment</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Feb. 3, 2011, came and went without much fanfare, but it was a milestone for Internet stakeholders, whether they knew it or not. On that Thursday, the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/020311-ipv4-ceremony.html">last available IPv4 addresses were allocated</a> by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). Though some Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) have a reasonable inventory of IP addresses that could last another year or two, the days of "new" IPv4 address allocations are largely over. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/8_security_considerations_for_ipv6_deployment">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-06-09T11:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Uprooting of the DNS Root (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/852211_uprooting_the_dns_root</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/852211_uprooting_the_dns_root</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The folks at Renesys <a href="http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/05/identity_theft_hits_the_root_n_1.shtml">pointed out earlier this week</a> some interesting activity surrounding the L-root name server, highlighting some activity that should give us all yet another reason to be concerned about the security and integrity of the Internet DNS... considering that a great deal of malware today tends to <a href="http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/papers/ndss08_dns.pdf">corrupt the DNS resolution path</a> in order to further exploit compromised end-systems, and that corruption, or any other actual end-system compromise, might well be unnecessary if the root were compromised -- well, think of the possibilities! <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/852211_uprooting_the_dns_root">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-22T12:32:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>