<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>David P. Reed &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from David P. Reed on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T17:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> White Space for Internet Use Interfering with Wireless Patient Devices? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is a germ of truth (perhaps a prion-sized germ or maybe just an amino acid) in the idea that transmitters in <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/13/business/NA-FIN-US-TV-vs-Internet-Medical-Devices.php">"white spaces" in the TV band *might* disrupt patient monitoring equipment</a> if designed by a lunatic who believes in sending massive pulses of energy in a whitespace in the TV band (perhaps amplified by a large parabolic dish antenna the size of a trashcan lid or larger, aimed at the patient monitor system. But that risk is completely shared with zillions of other potential radiators of energy in the entire electromagnetic spectrum... GE, of course, owns NBC. There is a MAJOR conflict of interest at the corporate level of GE... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-14T17:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>