<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Dave Burstein &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Dave Burstein on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-06-20T11:01:01-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Cisco: P2P Flat in North America? Some Experiencing Major Growth (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86201_cisco_p2p_flat_in_north_america</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86201_cisco_p2p_flat_in_north_america</link>
			<description><![CDATA[North American p2p went from 370 petabytes in 2006 to only 416 petabytes in 2007 according to Cisco's figures. Since U.S. users increased 16% in the same period, that's a drop in p2p per user and a significant drop in p2p as a percentage of all traffic. There's a major margin of error in these figures, so I'm calling it "flat." That's very different from pre 2007 experience, when p2p grew rapidly. It severely contradicts what many in Washington D.C. are saying... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86201_cisco_p2p_flat_in_north_america">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-20T11:01:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Overloading the Internet? Recent Media Reports Based on Dangerous Misinformation (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84103_overloading_the_internet</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84103_overloading_the_internet</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The London Times <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article3716781.ece">article</a> (and a similar one in the Guardian) are based on dangerous misinformation. The net isn't slowing down, and nearly no technical experts believe major "overload" problems likely on the backhaul, core, or decent local loop... Net traffic per user, as documented by Odlyzko and Cisco, has been growing at about 35-40% the last five years, and that growth rate is flat and possibly down the last two years. The net has been able to handle the increase without price increases, much less overload, because the primary and rate limiting equipment (switches, routers, WDM, etc.) have simultaneously been going down at a similar 35-40%. Moore's Law is bringing costs down and capacity up at a remarkable rate. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84103_overloading_the_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-10T17:15:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>