<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Lauren Weinstein &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Lauren Weinstein on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-07-05T12:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Vint Cerf Comments on Government's Role in Internet Broadband Access (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87590_vint_cerf_government_broadband_access</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87590_vint_cerf_government_broadband_access</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Some offhand comments by Google's Vint Cerf at a <a href="http://www.personaldemocracy.com/">recent event</a> seem to have a triggered a panicky "Vint Cerf proposes nationalizing the Internet" buzz that's been ramping up fairly rapidly. Holy BitTorrent, Batman! Army paratroopers seen dropping into parking lots at AT&T and Comcast, while the Transportation Security Agency orders us all to remove our shoes before surfing the Web! Settle down, everyone. As usual with these kinds of stories, the truth is significantly different from the breathless buzzing. Here's how Vint described his thinking on this issue to me... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87590_vint_cerf_government_broadband_access">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-05T12:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Call for "ISP Point of Contact" Database for Neutrality "Event" Concerns (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/isp_point_of_contact_net_neutrality</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/isp_point_of_contact_net_neutrality</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When I initiated <a href="http://www.nnsquad.org/">NNSquad (Network Neutrality Squad)</a>, one of my primary concerns was that many seemingly reportable "events" that can occur on the Internet -- and that might seem on their face to be network neutrality "violations" -- might actually be caused by innocent technical issues related to ISP operations, testing anomalies, or misinterpretation of test or otherwise observed data. Analysis of these situations -- which may invoke security and privacy concerns -- can be quite complex, and without a reasonably complete picture of events can also be considerably problematic... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/isp_point_of_contact_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-08T16:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>