<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>J.D. Falk &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from J.D. Falk on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-08-08T10:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> ACLU, Anti-Spam Laws, and the First Amendment (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://techliberation.com/2008/08/07/anti-spam-laws-and-the-first-amendment/">an article published by the Technology Liberation Front</a>, Cato Institute adjunct scholar Tim Lee dissects a <a href="http://www.acluva.org/docket/jaynes.html">recent argument by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)</a> regarding free speech &amp; anti-spam laws. It's been interesting to watch the ACLU wrestle with anti-spam legislation. Their entire purpose is to work through the legal system to protect our civil rights, as defined in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights" >First Amendment</a> -- which is why I've been a card-carrying member since before I was old enough to vote... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-08T10:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Technologists vs. Marketers: Talking Incompatible Talk Leads to Walking in the Wrong Direction (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As if conversations between technologists and marketers weren't already difficult enough, it appears that the Direct Marketing Association's (DMA) Email Experience Council <a href="http://blog.emailexperience.org/2008/07/make_it_pop_know_the_lingo_ema.html">wants to redefine</a> long-standardized terms such as "header" and "message." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T13:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> If Thou Be'st as Poor for a Subject as He's for a King... (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Way back in 1995, Wired reporter Simson Garfinkel <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.02/spam.king_pr.html">gave Jeff Slaton</a> the name "Spam King." Less than a year later, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_Wallace">Sanford Wallace</a> earned the title -- and soon had to share it (and his upstream provider) with Walt Rines. Others have come and gone; Sanford and Walt reappear every few years, together or separately, only to be <a href="http://boxofmeat.net/post/34718471/chicago-tribune-myspace-tells-ap-it-has-won-234m-spam">sued away again</a>... it seems as if any spammer noticed by law enforcement is immediately crowned "the Spam King," even when there are multiple such crownings happening at the same time. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T11:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Good News from Three Spam Cases in the U.S. (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/871611_good_news_three_spam_cases</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/871611_good_news_three_spam_cases</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They say (whoever "they" are) that good things come in threes, and that certainly seems true for law enforcement against spammers this week. In New York, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200807151739DOWJONESDJONLINE000656_FORTUNE5.htm">Adam Vitale was sentenced to 30 months in prison</a> and ordered to pay $183,000 in restitution for a week of spamming AOL back in 2005... In Illinois, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148428/weightloss_supplement_dealer_settles_spam_charges.html">an FTC settlement requires Spear Systems</a> and company executives Bruce Parker and Lisa Kimsey to give up $29,000, stop making "false or unsubstantiated claims about health benefits" of their products, and bars them from violating CAN-SPAM ever again... And finally, in Seattle, the Robert Soloway case continues... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/871611_good_news_three_spam_cases">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-16T11:38:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Identifying Spam: MAAWG's Latest Documents Improve Accuracy of Reputation Systems (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86273_maawgs_spam_reputation_systems</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86273_maawgs_spam_reputation_systems</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.maawg.org/">Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group (MAAWG)</a>, of which Return Path (my employer) is <a href="http://www.returnpath.net/blog/2008/03/why-does-return-path-spend-so.php">a very active participant</a>, met recently in <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jdfalk/sets/72157605616602356/">Heidelberg, Germany</a>. Among other exciting projects, they finished two new best practices documents which have been <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=157561">lauded in the press</a> as a big step towards stopping botnet spam... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86273_maawgs_spam_reputation_systems">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-27T14:59:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> If It Spams Like a Duck... (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84111_if_it_spams_like_a_duck</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84111_if_it_spams_like_a_duck</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We've been wondering what e360 hoped to gain with their recent lawsuits <a href="http://www.cauce.org/archives/63-Spamhaus-makes-progress-in-court.html">against Spamhaus</a> and others. If they were trying to clarify the right of ISPs to protect their users from spam, then they've certainly done a good job -- especially in this particular case. If it wasn't clear before, Judge Zagel's explanation should satisfy even the most pedantic of filtering opponents: "ISPs acting in good faith to protect their customers are not liable for blocking messages that some spammer claims are not spam..." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84111_if_it_spams_like_a_duck">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-11T12:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Trust in Email Begins with Authentication (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84210_trust_in_email_authentication</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84210_trust_in_email_authentication</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As most <a href="http://www.cauce.org">CAUCE</a> supporters already know, forging <em>'From:'</em> or other commonly seen email headers is trivially easy. It's one of the most frustrating oversights in the creation of Internet email technology -- though of course that's only obvious in hindsight; it was just fine for the pre-Internet networks of the late 1970s and early-mid 1980s. Since then, things have changed -- and the most interesting recent technological advancements in email have been in the realm of <em>sender authentication</em>, which encompasses ways to verify that the apparent sender of a message actually is the entity which sent it. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84210_trust_in_email_authentication">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-02T15:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>