<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Baher Esmat &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Baher Esmat on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2007-12-30T13:06:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Will 2008 be the WiMAX Year? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/712301_2008_wimax_year</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/712301_2008_wimax_year</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There has recently been some good and bad news about WiMAX. On the good news part, <a href="http://www.wimaxforum.org/news/pr/view?item_key=8d1130738624c45b0c0f7ca7956d0349178cc185">an announcement made by the WiMAX Forum</a> this month regarding the launching of the Mobile WiMAX certification program through which vendors can get their IEEE 802.16e-2005 equipment tested and possibly certified... On the bad news part, there was the <a href="http://newsreleases.sprint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=127149&p=irol-newsArticle_newsroom&ID=1075432">Sprint-Clearwire breakup</a> after three months of announcing a plan to join forces in building a nationwide WiMAX network in the US. Although it is anticipated that each company would carry on with its own WiMAX plans, analysts believe that the breakup would have negative impact on WiMAX deployment in the US... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/712301_2008_wimax_year">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-12-30T13:06:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>