<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Patrik Fältström &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Patrik Fältström on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-04-16T10:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Locking Out Competing Providers is Bad (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/841610_locking_out_competing_providers</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/841610_locking_out_competing_providers</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Today <a href="http://computersweden.idg.se/2.2683/1.156306">one of the headlines</a> in Computer Sweden was that there is a dispute between Telia and the regulator PTS in Sweden. PTS requires Telia to stop locking out competing TV-distribution companies for IP-TV in the access network (DSL) that Telia runs. Specifically, they lean towards the fact Telia is dominant provider of the copper, and require Telia to competitors give access to the larger frequency band in the copper that they claim is needed for TV distribution. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/841610_locking_out_competing_providers">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-16T10:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> ARIN Statement on the Future of Addressing Policy (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/arin_statement_addressing_policy</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/arin_statement_addressing_policy</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ARIN has just released <a href="http://www.arin.net/announcements/20070701.html">a statement</a> on the future of addressing policy. Specifically addressing the future of IPv4 addressing. What ARIN does is to emphasize the current policies and say they will be enforced even stronger than today if needed. I.e. there is no announcement of a change in policy. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/arin_statement_addressing_policy">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-08-02T09:40:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Scarcity of IPv4 Addresses (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/scarcity_ipv4_addresses</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/scarcity_ipv4_addresses</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My friend Kurtis <a href="http://www.kurtis.pp.se/blog/2007/07/on_the_exhaustion_of_ipv4_addr.html">writes in his blog</a> some points he has been thinking of while discussing "when we run out of IPv4 addresses". In reality, as he points out so well, we will not run out. It will be harder to get addresses. It is also the case that unfortunately people that push for IPv6 claim IPv6 will solve all different kinds of problem. Possibly also the starvation problems in the world... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/scarcity_ipv4_addresses">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-07-16T13:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Discussion at the Internet Governance Forum in Geneva (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/discussion_internet_governance_forum_geneva</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/discussion_internet_governance_forum_geneva</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While travelling home from Geneva, I was thinking quite a lot on the relationship between a ccTLD (registry) and a Country. This is because many countries are starting to talk louder and louder about the responsibilities Countries have on critical infrastructure, or (possibly more important) the management of the critical infrastructure. Will for example any (none?) of ccTLD operators (servers) sustain a denial of service attack of a scale similar to the attack on the root servers? What can ccTLD operators do to resist the malicious attacks? Should this be discussed? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/discussion_internet_governance_forum_geneva">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-05-31T11:48:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>