<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Tom Evslin &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Tom Evslin on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2012, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2011-09-28T14:59:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Google Finds Nothing is Shovel Ready, Not Even for Free Fiber Build (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110928_google_finds_nothing_is_shovel_ready_not_even_for_free_fiber_build</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110928_google_finds_nothing_is_shovel_ready_not_even_for_free_fiber_build</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Google is deploying fiber at its own expense in Kansas City, Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri to demonstrate the value of one gigabit (a gigabit is a billion bits -- a lot) per second residential Internet connections and perhaps to show at&amp;t and Verizon and the cable companies how the search giant might fight back if its growth is restricted by their restrictions or limitations. ... Whoops. Google just learned the same lesson that President Obama learned in Stimulus 1 <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110928_google_finds_nothing_is_shovel_ready_not_even_for_free_fiber_build">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-09-28T14:59:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Critical Data Belongs in the Cloud, Not Under It - Lessons Learned from Irene (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/critical_data_belongs_in_the_cloud_not_under_it_lessons_learned_from_irene</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/critical_data_belongs_in_the_cloud_not_under_it_lessons_learned_from_irene</link>
			<description><![CDATA["As flood waters from Tropical Storm Irene swamped the Waterbury state office complex, seven employees from the Vermont Agency of Human Services rushed inside to rescue computer servers that are critical for processing welfare checks and keeping track of paroled prisoners living around the state," according to a story by Shay Totten on the 7days blog Blurt. Two of the employees - network administrator Andrew Matt and deputy chief information officer Darin Prail - lost their cars in the parking lot as the river rose but kept on working to assure that our servers were not lost. "We didn't know how much time we had," Matt said, "and our job was to save the servers." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/critical_data_belongs_in_the_cloud_not_under_it_lessons_learned_from_irene">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-09-13T17:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Will Googlerola Be Able to Fight Data Caps? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110816_will_googlerola_be_able_to_fight_data_caps</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110816_will_googlerola_be_able_to_fight_data_caps</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Is Google Turning Into a Mobile Phone Company?" asks the headline in Andrew Ross Sorkin's <em>New York Times</em> story. Wrong question, IMHO. But is Google doing the deal at least partly to give it leverage over wireless providers? I think so. The biggest threat to the growth of Smart Phones and tablets and other Google businesses like YouTube is the imposition of data caps and metered pricing by wireless providers like at&amp;t and Verizon Wireless. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110816_will_googlerola_be_able_to_fight_data_caps">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-08-16T15:46:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Whom Do We Regulate when the Phone Monopolies Are Gone? - Universal Access (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone_universal_access</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone_universal_access</link>
			<description><![CDATA[After a more than 100 year run, the end is nigh for plain old telephone service (POTS). Through most of recent history POTS was provided by monopolies, which were regulated at both the federal and state level. The new world is much more competitive; we can talk via cell phones, computers, traditional phones hooked to a variety of devices instead of the old phone line, and a plethora of new gadgets like tablets. Voice service no longer has to be vertically integrated. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone_universal_access">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-06-16T08:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Whom Do We Regulate when the Phone Monopolies Are Gone? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time in a universe not very long ago phone service in the US was provided by regulated monopolies. AT&amp;T was the big one and there were (and are) hundreds of small ILECs (Independent Local Exchange Carriers) around the country. These monopolies were regulated both at the federal and state level. Then we began on the long road toward competition and deregulation. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/whom_do_we_regulate_when_the_phone_monopolies_are_gone">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-06-13T06:23:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Planning for the Ugly End of the Phone Network (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/planning_for_the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/planning_for_the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Consumers who have a choice are quickly deciding they don't need the old copper-based phone network, often known as POTS for Plain Old Telephone Service. We use our cellphones for talking even when we're not mobile. The cell phones have built in phone directories, easy ways to return calls, the ability to call a number on a web page; and we don't share them with our parents or children... It's a good year for traditional phone companies when they don't lose more than 10% of their POTS lines. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/planning_for_the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-05-23T08:21:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> The Ugly End of the Phone Network (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was a little early. "By the end of President Obama's first term, there won't be any more copper landlines left in the country, I blogged just after Obama had been elected. Before that I'd prophesized the end of POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) by 2010. Nevertheless, the end is nigh. And it's gonna be ugly without some planning. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_ugly_end_of_the_phone_network">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-05-13T08:23:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> LTE Insufficient from the Start, Boingo IPO Propitious (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110503_lte_insufficient_from_the_start_boingo_ipo_propitious</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110503_lte_insufficient_from_the_start_boingo_ipo_propitious</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The trouble with planning way ahead is that the world changes before you execute. The major wireless carriers have been planning their 4<sup>th</sup> generation LTE (Long Term Evolution) rollouts for a long time -- that's how they do things. Now, even as Verizon Wireless is doing an aggressive rollout of LTE, it's becoming clear that LTE networks will not be able to slake the data thirst of a world full of smart phones and tablets. Whoops. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110503_lte_insufficient_from_the_start_boingo_ipo_propitious">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-05-03T09:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Moore's Law and the Economics of Abundance (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/moores_law_and_the_economics_of_abundance</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/moores_law_and_the_economics_of_abundance</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Moore's Law explains why the price of everything electronic keeps going down; but now Moore's Law is starting to have an effect on much more than technology prices. The costs of energy, medicine, law, education, financial transactions, and government itself are falling because of Moore's Law's relentless progress. But these cost decreases are not being fully reflected in the prices we pay for all these things. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/moores_law_and_the_economics_of_abundance">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-03-29T11:30:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Verizon iPhone, AT&T Androids - Mobile Data is the Winner (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110112_verizon_iphone_atandroids_mobile_data_is_the_winner</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110112_verizon_iphone_atandroids_mobile_data_is_the_winner</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Announcement of the Verizon Wireless (VZW) iPhone and last week's announcements of Androids for AT&amp;T mean that we're going to have better mobile data networks at lower prices. That's the most important consequence of being able to choose your phone and your network separately. We in North America have a long way to go to have the mix and match choices of phones and service that most of the world has... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110112_verizon_iphone_atandroids_mobile_data_is_the_winner">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-01-12T10:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Broadband Stymied (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/broadband_stymied</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/broadband_stymied</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, no matter what else the stimulus bill may or may not have done, it's slowed down the rate of broadband deployment in the US over the last year. The Rural Utility Service (part of the US Agriculture Department) and NTIA (part of the US Commerce Department) have awarded only 15% of the first round money they promised to make available. To be blunt, they failed in their mission. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/broadband_stymied">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-02-18T15:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Ten Telecom Tsunamis (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090211_ten_telecom_tsunamis</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090211_ten_telecom_tsunamis</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The telecom industry five years from now will be unrecognizable. The creative destruction of the Internet broadly writ will be even greater than it has been in the last decade. The major telcos, the major television networks, and the major cablecos -- if they still exist at all -- will have very different revenue models than they have today. That's the good scenario... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090211_ten_telecom_tsunamis">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-02-11T15:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Julius Genachowski, FCC, and White Spaces: The Good and Not So Good News (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090113_julius_genachowski_fcc_white_spaces</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090113_julius_genachowski_fcc_white_spaces</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski, Obama's nominee to head the FCC, is a friend of Fred Wilson. Fred gives ten reasons why he likes the nominee on his blog. Genachowski was a top technology advisor to Obama during his campaign and reportedly advised the campaign on its superb use of the Internet. He is also a supporter of "net neutrality" although the devil is in the details on that issue. Even though the nominee is a lawyer, he has business experience as a VC, as an Internet executive, and as a board member of various Internet companies -- all good reasons to be hopeful about this very important policy post. That's the good news. The bad news from several days ago... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090113_julius_genachowski_fcc_white_spaces">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-01-13T15:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Why Government Investment in Broadband Is Justified Now (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090102_government_investment_in_broadband</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090102_government_investment_in_broadband</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bobbie Johnson, technology correspondent for <em>The Guardian</em>, was kind enough to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/02/obama-technology-cerf">quote me along with Vint Cerf</a> (nice to be in good company) on the importance of building an online economy and an online government. Vint said: "You know how they say opportunity lies on the edge of chaos? Maybe that's going to be true here too." So far our telecommunications infrastructure has largely been privately built and financed. Why should that change now? It's unusual for government to do anything as well as the private sector. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090102_government_investment_in_broadband">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-01-02T14:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Blocking BitTorrent in Britain (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081217_blocking_bittorrent_in_britain</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081217_blocking_bittorrent_in_britain</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Virgin Media announced its intention of restricting BitTorrent traffic on its new 50Mbps service according to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/16/virgin_bittorrent/">an article by Chris Williams</a> in <em>The Register</em>. Does this mean that net neutrality is endangered in the UK? The question is important because advocates of an open Internet like me hold the UK up as a positive example of net neutrality achieved through competition rather than through regulation. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081217_blocking_bittorrent_in_britain">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-17T16:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
