<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>Tom Evslin &#45; CircleID</title>
	<link></link>
	<description>Postings from Tom Evslin on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2008-05-07T06:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
	
	
	

	
	<item>
		<title> Sprint's Big Deal: New Life for WiMax (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal is reporting the terms of a yet unannounced deal which will finance a massive rollout of WiMax by a Sprint-Clearwire joint venture. Outside funding is to be provided by Intel, Google, Comcast, and Time Warner Cable as well as Bright House, a small cable company. Assuming the deal is for real, this is good news for US users of broadband and, indirectly, other users around the world. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T06:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Google's Gigabit Gambit (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/83258_googles_gigabit_gambit</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/83258_googles_gigabit_gambit</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Want a gig (1000 megabits per second) of Internet access bandwidth? Google says you could have it by the end of next year "from Manhattan to rural North Dakota (sic, I think they meant Vermont)" if their proposal to the FCC is accepted forthwith <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9901747-7.html">according to CNET's newsblog</a>. Not only a gig but a mobile gig, accessible by cellphone or roaming computer -- no fiber required. Sound too good to be true? -- it isn't, IMHO! Engineering is not the problem... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/83258_googles_gigabit_gambit">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-03-25T08:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> WiMAX vs. WiFi (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/92208_wimax_vs_wifi</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/92208_wimax_vs_wifi</link>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/wifi">WiFi</a> (technically standard 802.11) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/wimax">WiMAX</a> (802.16) don't compete for broadband users or applications today. That's partly because WiFi is widely deployed and WiMAX is still largely an unfulfilled promise and partly because the two protocols were designed for very different situations. However, if WiMAX is eventually widely deployed, there will be competition between them as last mile technologies. Some people describe the difference between WiFi and WiMAX as analogous to the difference between a cordless phone and a mobile phone... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/92208_wimax_vs_wifi">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-02-20T08:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Verizon OPEN Wireless (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/711284_verizon_open_wireless</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/711284_verizon_open_wireless</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Very surprising and welcome <a href="http://news.vzw.com/news/2007/11/pr2007-11-27.html">announcement from Verizon Wireless</a> yesterday announcing that "it will provide customers the option to use, on its nationwide wireless network, wireless devices, software and applications not offered by the company. Verizon Wireless plans to have this new choice available to customers throughout the country by the end of 2008..." And Verizon Wireless is right to open up. There's plenty of room to be cynical about this; after all, Verizon Wireless is trying to STOP the FCC from putting an openness requirement on the 700Mhz spectrum to be auctioned... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/711284_verizon_open_wireless">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-11-28T16:58:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Comcast's Wrong Approach (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/710262_comcast_wrong_approach</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/710262_comcast_wrong_approach</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have to do a lot more than just provide a pipe from your residence to their facilities to assure that you have a good Internet experience. There is a raging debate, inextricable from the debate on Network Neutrality, both on what the proper responsibilities of an ISP are AND what methods are proper for carrying out those responsibilities. Recently Comcast has received a serious black eye for blocking BitTorrent traffic in what it says was just a legitimate exercise in protecting most users from the few who abuse their "unlimited access"... Even if we give Comcast the benefit of the doubt and assume they are not influenced at all in their decision of what traffic to block by the fact that P2P protocols like BitTorrent are used to distribute material which competes for precious user attention with the content that Comcast sells, what Comcast is doing is still wrong if not illegal. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/710262_comcast_wrong_approach">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-10-26T14:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> The Third Stage of the VoIP Rocket Never Fired (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/710119_third_stage_voip_never_fired</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/710119_third_stage_voip_never_fired</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten years ago was the dawn of Voice over IP (VoIP). The pioneering Israeli company <a href="http://www.vocaltec.com/">VocalTec</a> had just released its VoIP software for PCs (it was named iPhone, BTW). Industry guru <a href="http://www.pulver.com/">Jeff Pulver</a> (whom I now partner with in <a href="http://www.freeworlddialup.com/">FWD</a>) had begun to hold his Voice on the Net (<a href="http://www.von.com/">VON</a>) shows. As the founder of VoIP startup ITXC, I was invited to give a keynote at VON in Boston. The evolution of VoIP, I opined with the requisite PowerPoint slides, will be like a three stage rocket. I was right about the first two stages and dead wrong about the third... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/710119_third_stage_voip_never_fired">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-10-11T09:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> FON and BT: Wifi Today; Mobile Tomorrow? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/710412_fon_british_telecom_wifi</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/710412_fon_british_telecom_wifi</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A deal <a href="http://blog.fon.com/en/archive/general/btfon041007.html">announced today</a> between British Telecom and upstart <a href="http://www.fon.com/">FON</a> allows BT's Internet customers to share their own broadband connections via WiFi and, in turn, be able to access WiFi free at "thousands" (doesn't say how many) of FON hotspots around the world operated by other Foneros... When you buy home Internet access from BT and opt into this plan, you are also buying roaming access at no extra charge. The technology is supposed to assure that the part of the connection which you share is segregated from your own access so that there are no security problems caused by the sharing. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/710412_fon_british_telecom_wifi">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-10-04T12:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Rent vs. Buy: The Driver of Economics (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/79510_rent_buy_economics_voip</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/79510_rent_buy_economics_voip</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We the people like to own stuff and not pay rent to use it (BTW, rent includes taxes but that's another story). They the oligarchs like to own the stuff and charge us rent to use it. The rise of a middle class has historically meant the rise of a property-owning class. The underclass pays exorbitant rents. The telecommunications world -- or at least the US part of it -- is a battle of rent vs. buy. Economics says that ownership or rentership is all based on access to capital. Certainly capital is a huge part of the equation -- can you spell "home loan"?; but it's not the whole story... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/79510_rent_buy_economics_voip">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-09-05T09:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> P2P: Boon, Boondoggle, or Bandwidth Hog? (The Dark Side) (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/070816_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth_dark</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/070816_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth_dark</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/070815_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth/">Yesterday's post</a> explained how peer-to-peer (P2P) applications use the processing power, bandwidth, and storage capacity of participants in a service rather than centralized resources. This makes such applications generally less subject to catastrophic failure, much less subject to running out of resources (since each new user brings new capacity as well as new demand), and much cheaper FOR THE PROVIDER of the application in terms of hardware and bandwidth required. It's the FOR THE PROVIDER part that's the rub. Let's consider the case of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayerbeta/find_out_more.shtml">BBC's iPlayer service</a>... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/070816_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth_dark">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-08-16T17:34:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> P2P: Boon, Boondoggle, or Bandwidth Hog? (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/070815_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/070815_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on whom you ask, peer-to-peer (P2P) services may be the best thing that ever happened to the Internet or a diabolical arbitrage scheme which will ruin all ISPs and bring an end to the Internet as we think we know it. Some famous P2P services include ICQ, Skype, Napster, and BitTorrent. Currently a new P2P service called <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayerbeta/">iPlayer from BBC</a> is causing some consternation and eliciting some <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/13/isp_bbc_iplayer_neutrality/">threatening growls from British ISPs</a>... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/070815_p2p_boon_boondoggle_bandwidth">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-08-15T13:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Prediction: Google WILL Bid for 700MHz Spectrum and WILL Win (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/070807_google_bid_700mhz_spectrum</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/070807_google_bid_700mhz_spectrum</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an excellent business case for Google bidding megabucks in the upcoming 700MHz auction and investing even more to get a network up and running. I think Google is well aware of the value to them if they win and the harm they'd suffer if the duopoly wins instead. Google can make big bucks with a nationwide third network AND make things better for all Internet users AND improve the United States' pathetic competitive position in the contest for broadband access. Hope this post doesn't end up post-tagged "wishful thinking"... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/070807_google_bid_700mhz_spectrum">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-08-07T09:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> First Impression: FCC Rules for the 700MHz Auction (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_700mhz_spectrum_auction</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_700mhz_spectrum_auction</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/073107/700mhz_news_release_073107.pdf">FCC has issued rules</a> which will govern the auction of valuable radio spectrum which could make a huge difference in the price and quality of communications in America. The glass is definitely half something: I'd say closer to empty than full but there are some things to like and some hope for competition. The decision is a compromise. Republican Chairman Martin was joined by Democrat Commissioners Adelstein and Copps in setting some open access conditions for 22MHz out of the 62MHz which will be auctioned. Republican Commissioner Tate reluctantly went along with these conditions and Republican McDowell voted against them. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_700mhz_spectrum_auction">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-07-31T18:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item>
		<title> Google's Good Bandwidth Gambit (Featured Blog)</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_fcc_bandwidth_gambit</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_fcc_bandwidth_gambit</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Chairman Eric Schmidt has made the FCC <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/20070720_wireless.html">an offer it</a> shouldn't refuse. At this point it's unlikely that the FCC will accept but it would be good for the United States if it did -- and good for Google, of course. Two problems with the Google offer: at&t and Verizon hate it and it probably would result in the 700MHz auction bringing in somewhat less money (immediately) for the treasury than an alternative which would encourage the telcos to bid. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_fcc_bandwidth_gambit">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2007-07-23T16:21:00-08:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	

	</channel>
</rss>