<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Philip S Corwin &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Philip S Corwin on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-03-01T14:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> ICA Posts Position Paper and Analysis of Snowe "Anti-Phishing" Legislation (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Internet Commerce Association (<a href="http://www.internetcommerce.org/">ICA</a>) has posted a position paper and analysis of S. 2661, introduced on 2/25/08 in the US Senate. While we are firmly opposed to phishing and other criminal activities that may utilize domain names we are very concerned about the provisions of the proposal that appear to provide trademark owners with a means to avoid both UDRP and ACPA actions and alternatively bring private claims against domain names with a lower burden of proof and the potential for far higher monetary damages, without even requiring an allegation that the DN was in any way being utilized in a phishing scheme... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-03-01T14:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> ICANN Threatens RegisterFly Termination (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_threatens_registerfly_termination</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_threatens_registerfly_termination</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ICANN sent a 10-page letter to RegisterFly on February 21st threatening to terminate its accreditation. The letter is available <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/registerfly-notice-of-breach-21feb07.pdf">here</a>. ICANN's not exactly advertising this -- no conspicuous notice appears on its home page and, more curiously, no update has been posted by the Ombudsman despite two prior postings about RegisterFly in the past week. A member of the general public would be hard pressed to find out that any action has been threatened. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_threatens_registerfly_termination">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-02-23T07:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> ICA Questions ICANN on RegisterFly (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ica_questions_icann_registerfly</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ica_questions_icann_registerfly</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Internet Commerce Association sent this letter to ICANN yesterday in regard to the RegisterFly situation: "I am writing to you in my capacity as Counsel to the Internet Commerce Association (ICA), a non-profit trade association dedicated to promoting and protecting the rights of domain name (DN) owners... It has come to our attention that an ICANN-accredited registrar is in the midst of what appears to be a near-complete operational breakdown, and that its ongoing failure to carry out its responsibilities is causing substantial economic loss to tens of thousands of DN registrants in both the United States and multiple foreign jurisdictions." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ica_questions_icann_registerfly">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-02-22T09:01:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>