<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Jon Nevett &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Jon Nevett on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2012, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2009-09-29T10:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Registry-Registrar Cross Ownership: Framing the Issues (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/registry_registrar_cross_ownership_framing_the_issues</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/registry_registrar_cross_ownership_framing_the_issues</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There has been much said and written recently about the issue of registry-registrar cross ownership with regard to New Top Level Domains ("New TLDs"). It is clear that there appears to be a fair amount of confusion about the issue and the positions espoused by various parties. To assist the ICANN community in understanding the issue -- the points of agreement and debate -- I offer the following overview on behalf of Network Solutions and Central Registry Solutions... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/registry_registrar_cross_ownership_framing_the_issues">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-09-29T10:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
