<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Ale &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Ale on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2007-05-17T09:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Hotmail Running Its Own SMTP Variation (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/hotmail_running_own_smtp</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/hotmail_running_own_smtp</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Companies sensible to effective delivery of email to all free email services may have noticed problems with deliveries to Hotmail addresses. Despite the SMTP dialog ending with a successful "250" return code, recipients don't see the message. In their <a href="http://postmaster.msn.com/Guidelines.aspx">Guidelines</a>, MSN require thorough compliance with IETF standards. However, it seems they have their own interpretation about provisions for <em>Delivery Status Notifications</em>, a.k.a. bounces, that servers must send after they have accepted responsibility for delivering the message... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/hotmail_running_own_smtp">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-05-17T09:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>