<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Christopher Parente &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Christopher Parente on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-05-30T11:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Revision3 and Media Defender (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/revision3_and_media_defender</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/revision3_and_media_defender</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lots of coverage in the last two days about a Memorial Day weekend attack that took down the servers of Revision3, an Internet video network. This story has a lot of ingredients -- P2P maneuvering, DDoS attack, copyright vs. piracy, talk of laws broken and the FBI investigating. What's the CircleID take? <a href="http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3">Revision3's description</a>. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/revision3_and_media_defender">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30T11:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> A Patent for SiteFinder-Like Resolution (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting news item that broke Monday courtesy of DomainNameNews and SlashDot that hasn't been broadly covered yet. I'm surprised no one has posted on this yet on CircleID, so here goes. Apparently VeriSign has been awarded a patent for the resolution of mis-typed domain names. This was at the heart of the controversy back in 2003 around their SiteFinder Service. Amidst a storm of criticism ICANN insisted VeriSign shut down the service, and the company eventually agreed. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-07T17:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>