<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Antony Van Couvering &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Antony Van Couvering on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-06-26T13:08:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Launch of .PARIS (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86262_launch_of_paris_domain_icann</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86262_launch_of_paris_domain_icann</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, hundreds of sweaty ICANN attendees put on their best clothes and braved the crush of the rush hour metro on a very hot day to crush together for the <a href="http://par.icann.org/en/node/61">ICANN gala</a> at the overwrought Hotel de Ville (city hall) in Paris. Most of them missed an interesting announcement. I arrived an hour late, but even so food and drink were not yet served (not even water), and everyone was in desperate need of provisioning. The dull roar of heat-induced complaining drowned out the dignitaries making speeches at the far end of the hall. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86262_launch_of_paris_domain_icann">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26T13:08:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> How Many TLD Applications Will ICANN Receive? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_many_tld_applications_icann</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_many_tld_applications_icann</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This post could be subtitled: "The Wisdom of Elites." I polled some people I know in the domain field (plus Andrew Goodman, who wondered what the hell I was going on about). I asked them a simple question: "For the record, how many new TLD applications do you think there'll be?" Most of these people know the domain name world very well, but from different perspectives. Journalists, registrars, intellectual property attorneys, domainers, registry operators, TLD aspirants, entrepreneurs, domain aftermarket auctioneers, civil society activists... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_many_tld_applications_icann">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-11T10:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Domain Name Price Jump: Moore's Law or Parkinson's Laws? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As expected, <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/03/24/daily57.html">VeriSign raised the price of domain names</a>, effective in October. New prices wholesale prices (to the registrar) for .com domain names are going from $6.42 to $6.86, while .net will increase from $3.85 to $4.23. This news came a few days ago in a <a href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/registries/big-shocker-verisign-raises-prices-again/1492">letter to registrars</a>. (Hint to consumers: renew your domains now.) ...So, basically, many if not most of VeriSign's registry costs have been falling at an exponential rate. Hard disk storage, computing performance, bandwidth, RAM storage... yet the cost is going up. How is this justified? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-03T09:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Why is .EU Trying to Destroy the Internet? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/eu_trying_to_destroy_internet</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/eu_trying_to_destroy_internet</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Eurid, the operator of .EU, <a href="http://www.eurid.eu/en/general/news/the-201c-eu201d-success-leads-to-a-considerable-price-reduction">announced</a> that it was cutting its wholesale price from 10 Euros to 5 Euros (about US$6.40 at today's rate). Is Eurid crazy? They're cutting the price in half! Eurid is acting as if unit cost should go <em>down</em> as sales increase! Haven't they learned the lesson... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/eu_trying_to_destroy_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-11-20T10:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> IDNs and IE7 and the Coming Storm (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/idns_and_ie7_and_the_coming_storm</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/idns_and_ie7_and_the_coming_storm</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you're brave, today you can finally download the Internet Explorer 7 public beta. Why should you be interested? Not because the browser's wonderful. It isn't -- initial reports are that it's not ready for prime-time. But you might be interested to know that as of today, users of IE will be able to use internationalized domain names (IDNs). ...Many other browsers are already IDN-capable, including Firefox, but most people in the world use Explorer. Think China, Japan, India. Think most of the world's population... Think of millions of new Internet users working in their own language, customers for commercial goods and services. But think also about intellectual property nightmares, think about phishing, think about whether there's one interoperable Internet, or several Internets acting very weird. These issues and others will become big news when people start using IDNs massively -- and with support from Internet Explorer, that's about to happen. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/idns_and_ie7_and_the_coming_storm">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-02-03T07:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> What's Wrong with Domain Names? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/whats_wrong_with_domain_names</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/whats_wrong_with_domain_names</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Despite the <a href="http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2005/11/19/15-of-all-web-traffic/">significant traffic</a> that comes from typed-in domain names, the public harumphing and clucking about type-in traffic is climbing in volume as it becomes clear how much money is involved. Articles this week show that domain names, and the people who make money on them, are making some commentators uncomfortable. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/whats_wrong_with_domain_names">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-12-22T09:32:36-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> She Gave Me a Fake Phone Number! (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/she_gave_me_a_fake_phone_number</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/she_gave_me_a_fake_phone_number</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/intellectual-property/">Intellectual Property Constituency</a>, meeting at the ICANN conference in Vancouver, was interested in increasing ICANN's budget not because they thought they deserved it, but because they wanted ICANN to actually enforce the rules on the books about fake registrations. Now there's some evidence about how prevalent that is. If there's any surprise here, it's that the numbers are so low. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/she_gave_me_a_fake_phone_number">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-12-08T20:54:24-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>