<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Ray King &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Ray King on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2012, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2004-10-13T09:15:20-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Advocating Ratio Model for Deleting Domains (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/advocating_ratio_model_for_deleting_domains</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/advocating_ratio_model_for_deleting_domains</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To date, end-users (of all levels of technical ability) who are trying to find a good domain name to establish an online identity have been endlessly frustrated by the lack of a method to fairly re-allocate "used" domain names. A full resolution to that problem is a separate (and much bigger) discussion... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/advocating_ratio_model_for_deleting_domains">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-10-13T09:15:20-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
