<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Milton Mueller &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Milton Mueller on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-07-13T20:54:01-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Is It Time to Create a Market for IPv4 Addresses? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's fascinating to watch the Internet technical community grapple with policy economics as they face the problems creating by the growing scarcity of IPv4 addresses. The Internet Governance Project (IGP) is analyzing the innovative policies that <a href="http://www.arin.net">ARIN</a>, <a href="http://www.ripe.net">RIPE</a> and <a href="http://www.apnic.net">APNIC</a> are considering as a response to the depletion of IPv4 addresses. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-13T20:54:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Homeland Security Department Was Warned About DNSSEC Key Ownership and Trust Issues (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/homeland_security_warned_about_dnssec</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/homeland_security_warned_about_dnssec</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://blog.internetgovernance.org">Internet Governance Project</a> has unearthed a consultancy <a href="http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2007/12/19/3419292.html">report</a> to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that makes it clear that the issue of root signing and DNSSEC key management has been recognized as a political issue within the US government for long time. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/homeland_security_warned_about_dnssec">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-12-19T10:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Another Whois-Privacy Stalemate (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_whois_privacy_stalemate</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_whois_privacy_stalemate</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/icann-whois-wg-report-final-1-9.pdf">The report of the Whois Working Group</a> was published today. The Working Group could not achieve agreement on how to reconcile privacy and data protection rights with the interests of intellectual property holders and law enforcement agencies. So the Working Group Chair redefined the meaning of "agreement." See the full story at the <a href="http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2007/8/22/3174023.html">Internet Governance Project</a> site. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_whois_privacy_stalemate">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-08-22T00:32:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> XXX Comes to a Head (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_comes_to_a_head</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_comes_to_a_head</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought the .xxx affair couldn't get any worse, it does. I'm beginning to think that ICANN's approach to TLD approval was cooked up by a demented sergeant from Abu Ghraib... Now, after the triple x people negotiated with ICANN's staff a contract that met all prior objections, and heads into what should be its final approval, word is that a few ICANN Board members are leaning in a negative direction. What is the reason? A group of pornographers has organized a campaign against .xxx, flooding ICANN's comment box with overwhelmingly negative remarks. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_comes_to_a_head">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-03-09T10:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Europeans Moderate GAC Principles, But... (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/europeans_moderate_gac_principles</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/europeans_moderate_gac_principles</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A U.S.-led Task Force in ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) released version 3 of its "Whois Principles" in preparation for the ICANN meeting in Brazil, where it will be debated and finalized. European countries pushed back against U.S. Government efforts to stop ICANN from respecting privacy concerns in its handling of domain name registrant contact data... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/europeans_moderate_gac_principles">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-12-03T11:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Assault on State Censorship at the IGF (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/assault_on_state_censorship_at_the_igf</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/assault_on_state_censorship_at_the_igf</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Knee-jerk UN haters in the US are fond of pointing horrified fingers at the presence of China, Syria and other authoritarian states whenever global governance is mentioned. See for example <a href="http://news.com.com/U.N.+proposes+changes+to+Nets+operation/2100-1028_3-6130549.html">Declan McCullough's slanted piece in CNET</a>. They might be surprised to learn that the UN Internet Governance Forum has opened the opportunity for a major assault on Internet blocking and filtering, and put repressive governments on the defensive by heightening awareness of the practice and pressuring them to justify it or change it... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/assault_on_state_censorship_at_the_igf">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-11-01T09:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Another View of the New ICANN-DoC Agreement (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_view_icann_doc_agreement</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_view_icann_doc_agreement</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new MoU, called a Joint Project Agreement (JPA) is a cosmetic response to the comments received by NTIA during its Notice of Inquiry in July 2006. The object seems to be to strengthen the public's perception that ICANN is relatively independent. But the relationship between the USG and ICANN is fundamentally unchanged. In one important respect, the JPA has actually increased direct US intervention. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/another_view_icann_doc_agreement">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-10-01T09:29:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> New WHOIS Definition Survives Marrakech ICANN Meeting (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/whois_definition_survives_icann_meeting</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/whois_definition_survives_icann_meeting</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For now, it appears that the new, more technically focused and privacy-friendly definition of the purpose of Whois survived the Marrakech meeting. The U.S. Government and the copyright and law enforcement interests mounted a major onslaught against the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) action, using the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) as their pressure point.  <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/whois_definition_survives_icann_meeting">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-07-01T08:43:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Send a Message to NTIA (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/send_a_message_to_ntia</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/send_a_message_to_ntia</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://internetgovernance.org">Internet Governance Project</a> is is urging Internet users everywhere, but especially those outside the United States, to respond to the NTIA Notice of Inquiry with the following statement: "The Internet's value is created by the participation and cooperation of people all over the world. The Internet is global, not national. Therefore no single Government should have a pre-eminent role in Internet governance. As the US reviews its contract with ICANN, it should work cooperatively with all stakeholders to complete the transition to a Domain Name System independent of US governmental control." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/send_a_message_to_ntia">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-06-14T08:30:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> XXX Litigation Looms (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_litigation_looms</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_litigation_looms</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The XXX drama isn't over. Today ICM Registry announced that it would file a reconsideration request with ICANN and a judicial appeal to challenge redactions and omissions from the internal US government documents released to it under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. These could prove to be opening moves in a more extended round of litigation. In connection with its judicial appeal, ICM Registry released 88 pages of internal US Commerce Department documents obtained under the FOIA showing how the U.S. handled its application. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/xxx_litigation_looms">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-05-19T09:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Why Don't GAC Representatives Follow Their Own National Law? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gac_representatives_national_law</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gac_representatives_national_law</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago ICANN's domain name policy making organ (the GNSO) <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/historic_vote_on_whois_reformers_win/">decided</a> that the purpose of Whois was domain name coordination and not compulsory surveillance of domain name registrants. The US and Australian governments expressed their opposition. The US government's lack of concern for privacy is well known. But what about Australia? The Australian ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) representative, Ashley Cross, tried to use his authority as "a government" to intimidate the GNSO, sending it a message announcing that "Australia" supports a broader definition of Whois purpose that gives ICANN a blank check... What does "Australia" really support, however? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gac_representatives_national_law">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-05-05T09:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> In Historic Vote on WHOIS Purpose, Reformers Win by 2/3 Majority (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/historic_vote_on_whois_reformers_win</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/historic_vote_on_whois_reformers_win</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It has taken almost three years -- by some counts, more than 6 years -- but ICANN's <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/">domain name policy making organization</a> has finally taken a stand on Whois and privacy. And the results were a decisive defeat for the copyright and trademark interests and the US government, and a stunning victory for advocates of the rights of individual domain name registrants... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/historic_vote_on_whois_reformers_win">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-04-12T11:07:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Put Free Expression on the Internet Governance Forum Agenda (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/free_expression_on_internet_governance_forum</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/free_expression_on_internet_governance_forum</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org" title="The Internet Governance Project ">The Internet Governance Project</a> has joined free-expression advocacy organizations <a href="http://www.rsf.org" title="Reporters Without Borders">Reporters Without Borders</a> and <a href="http://www.article19.org/" title="Article 19">Article 19</a> to push for including Internet censorship and filtering problems on the agenda of the first meeting of the new Internet Governance Forum (IGF), a multistakeholder deliberation body created by the World Summit on the Information Society... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/free_expression_on_internet_governance_forum">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-03-30T15:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> How to Build an Internet Governance Forum (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_to_build_an_internet_governance_forum</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_to_build_an_internet_governance_forum</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Public consultations on the new "Internet Governance Forum" being created by the United Nations will be held in Geneva February 16-17. The <a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org">Internet Governance Project</a> has released a new discussion paper explaining how the Forum could work. The Forum must be as open as possible and give all stakeholders equal participation rights. Its deliberations must be wide-ranging and resist politically motivated barriers to discussion. And its products must feed into other, more authoritative Internet governance forums. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_to_build_an_internet_governance_forum">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-02-05T16:35:07-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> The XXX Train Wreck in Vancouver (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_xxx_train_wreck_in_vancouver</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_xxx_train_wreck_in_vancouver</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is now clear that by sending its letter of August 12 blocking approval of the .XXX domain, the US Government has done more to undermine ICANN's status as a non-governmental, multi-stakeholder policy body than any of its Internet governance "enemies" in the ITU, China, Brazil, or Iran. And despite all the calls for a government role that would ensure "rule of law" and "accountability" of ICANN, the interventions of governments are making this aspect of Internet governance more arbitrary and less accountable. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_xxx_train_wreck_in_vancouver">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-12-03T11:57:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>