<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Bill Thompson &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Bill Thompson on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-09-27T09:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> A Link to Eternity (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/link_to_eternity</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/link_to_eternity</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While Google is as secretive about its internal processes and systems as Apple is about product development, every now and then senior people post articles on the official Google blog and offer their thoughts on the development of the web. In the latest posting, two Google engineers, Alfred Spector and Franz Och, look at how search strategies will benefit from the faster computers, greater volumes of data and better algorithms we are likely to see in the next decade, speculating that "we could train our systems to discern not only the characters or place names in a YouTube video or a book, for example, but also to recognise the plot or the symbolism." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/link_to_eternity">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-27T09:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Shouting 'Bug' on a Crowded Internet... (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87229_shouting_bug_crowded_internet</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87229_shouting_bug_crowded_internet</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the last few weeks we've seen two very different approaches to the full disclosure of security flaws in large-scale computer systems. Problems in the domain name system have been kept quiet long enough for vendors to find and fix their software, while details of how to hack Transport for London's Oyster card will soon be available to anyone with a laptop computer and a desire to break the law. These two cases highlight a major problem facing the computing industry, one that goes back many years and is still far from being unresolved. Given that there are inevitably bugs, flaws and unexpected interactions in complex systems, how much information about them should be made public by researchers when the details could be helpful to criminals or malicious hackers? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87229_shouting_bug_crowded_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-22T09:50:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Storm Warning for Cloud Computing: More Like a Miasma (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/852711_storm_warning_cloud_computing</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/852711_storm_warning_cloud_computing</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The approach is growing in popularity, and Google, Microsoft and Amazon are among the many large companies working on ways to attract users to their offerings, with Google Apps, Microsoft's Live Mesh and Amazon S3 all signing up customers as they try to figure out what works and what can turn a profit... In the real world national borders, commercial rivalries and political imperatives all come into play... The issue was recently highlighted by reports that the Canadian government has a policy of not allowing public sector IT projects to use US-based hosting services because of concerns over data protection. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/852711_storm_warning_cloud_computing">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-27T11:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Do We Need Two Internets? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Zittrain's recent book, <em>The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It</em>, has spurred a lot of discussion both online and offline, with blog posts lauding his insights or criticising his over-apocalyptic imagination. The book itself makes fascinating reading for those who have watched the network grow from its roots in the research community into today's global channel for communications, commerce and cultural expression... One of the reasons that Zittrain puts forward for the growing popularity of closed or, as he prefers 'tethered', devices, is that they are less vulnerable to hacking, security flaws, malware and all the other perils that face any internet-enabled system. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-14T14:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> The Fragile Network (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_fragile_network</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_fragile_network</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One of the more persistent founding myths around the internet is that it was designed to be able to withstand a nuclear war, built by the US military to ensure that even after the bombs had fallen there would still be communications between surviving military bases. It isn't true, of course. The early days of the ARPANET, the research network that predated today's internet, were dominated by the desire of computer scientists to find ways to share time on expensive mainframe computers rather than visions of Armageddon. Yet the story survives... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_fragile_network">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-01-19T10:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Development Matters More than Domains (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/development_matters_more_than_domains</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/development_matters_more_than_domains</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The advance teams are already gathered in Tunisia ahead of next week's second phase of the World Summit on the Information Society, and those of us on the press list are being deluged with announcements, releases, notices and invitations to meetings. The meeting, which runs from 15-18 November, is an opportunity to look at the progress that has been made since December 2003, when representatives and heads of state gathered in Geneva. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/development_matters_more_than_domains">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-11-11T16:56:15-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> A Network by Any Other Name (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/a_network_by_any_other_name</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/a_network_by_any_other_name</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Last month Wired News, the online service that grew out of Wired Magazine, decided that it was going stop using an upper-case 'I' when it talked about the internet. At the same time Web became web and Net became net. According to Tony Long, the man responsible for their style guide, the change was made because 'there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words'. In fact, he claims, 'there never was.' ...Forgive me for saying, but those who choose 'internet' over 'Internet' are as wrong as those who would visit london, meet the queen or go for a boat trip down the river thames. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/a_network_by_any_other_name">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-09-09T13:25:44-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>