<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>CircleID</title>
	<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
	<description>Latest posts featured on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2008-05-09T08:39:00-08:00</dc:date>

	


	<item>
		<title>IPv4 Shortage and Trading Concerns as Hot Marketable Goods</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[With IPv4 addresses in short supply, they could become increasingly interesting and marketable goods. This is a concern for Regional Internet Registries (RIR) that are in charge of managing IP address allocations. Heise Online reports: "If they officially permit transfers or sales in the future, they will be implicitly accepting commercialization and privatization. Any attempt to insist on the return of addresses to the RIRs could drive trading, which is probably inevitable, underground..." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-09T08:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>ipv6</category><category>ip addressing</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>A Patent for SiteFinder&#45;Like Resolution</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting news item that broke Monday courtesy of DomainNameNews and SlashDot that hasn't been broadly covered yet. I'm surprised no one has posted on this yet on CircleID, so here goes. Apparently VeriSign has been awarded a patent for the resolution of mis-typed domain names. This was at the heart of the controversy back in 2003 around their SiteFinder Service. Amidst a storm of criticism ICANN insisted VeriSign shut down the service, and the company eventually agreed. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T18:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>legal issues</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Coders, Crackers and Bots, Oh My!</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There are more than just blue, black and white hat hackers. There are a few more types of folks out there that don't fit into the above categories. This article is taken from <a href="http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/cyberwarfare_101_black_hats_white_hats_crackers_and_bots">Stratfor</a> with some commentary by myself... Many of the hackers described in my <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/black_hats_white_hats_crackers_bots/">previous post</a> are also coders, or "writers," who create viruses, worms, Trojans, bot protocols and other destructive "malware" tools used by hackers... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T10:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category><category>security</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Black Hats, White Hats, Crackers and Bots</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/black_hats_white_hats_crackers_bots/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/black_hats_white_hats_crackers_bots/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the other web sites I subscribe to is <a href="http://www.stratfor.com/">Stratfor</a>. It's a global intelligence website and doesn't really have much to do with spam. But I like politics so I read it. They have some articles which you can get for free, but the better stuff you have to pay for. About two weeks ago, they ran a three-part series on Cyberwarfare. The first article was the title of this post, which you can access <a href="http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/cyberwarfare_101_black_hats_white_hats_crackers_and_bots">here</a> (requires registration). In the article they described different types of cybercriminals and not-so-criminals which they referred to under the umbrella as "hackers." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/black_hats_white_hats_crackers_bots/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T09:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category><category>security</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Sprint&#8217;s Big Deal: New Life for WiMax</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal is reporting the terms of a yet unannounced deal which will finance a massive rollout of WiMax by a Sprint-Clearwire joint venture. Outside funding is to be provided by Intel, Google, Comcast, and Time Warner Cable as well as Bright House, a small cable company. Assuming the deal is for real, this is good news for US users of broadband and, indirectly, other users around the world. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85780_sprints_deal_new_life_wimax/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T08:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>infrastructure</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>700 MHz Update: Will VZ Comply with the Rules?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85520_700_mhz_update_verizon/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85520_700_mhz_update_verizon/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday (HT: <a href="http://ipdemocracy.com">IPDemocracy</a>), Google filed a <a href="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/googlepetitiontodeny.pdf">petition</a> [PDF] asking that the Commission ensure that Verizon understands what those "open platform" requirements for the C Block really mean. Verizon has taken the position in the past that its own devices won't be subject to the "open applications" and "open handsets" requirements of the C Block rules, and Google says it is concerned that Verizon doesn't plan to follow those requirements in the future. This is big. Here's the background... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85520_700_mhz_update_verizon/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-05T16:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>net neutrality</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Jeremy Jaynes Gets One More Chance</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85410_jeremy_jaynes_more_chance/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85410_jeremy_jaynes_more_chance/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[n 2004 Jaynes became the country's first convicted spam felon under the Virginia anti-spam law. He's been appealing his conviction ever since, most recently losing an appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court by a 4-3 decision in February. As I <a href="http://weblog.johnlevine.com/Email/jaynesappeal.html">discussed in more detail at the time</a> the key questions were a) whether the Virginia law had First Amendment problems and b) whether Jaynes had standing to challenge it. The court answered No to b), thereby avoiding the need to answer a), the dissent answered Yes to both. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85410_jeremy_jaynes_more_chance/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-04T12:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>New CIRA Whois Policy Strikes Balance Between Privacy and Access</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly technology law column focuses this week on the new <a href="http://www.cira.ca/en/Whois/whois_intro.html">CIRA whois policy</a> that is scheduled to take effect on June 10, 2008. The whois issue has attracted little public attention, yet it has been the subject of heated debate within the domain name community for many years. It revolves around the whois database, a publicly accessible, searchable list of domain name registrant information (as in "who is" the registrant of a particular domain name). <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-02T11:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>privacy</category><category>whois</category><category>policy regulation</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Significant Chunk of IP Address Space Hijacked by Notorious Mass Emailing Company</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ip_address_space_hijacked_spammers/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ip_address_space_hijacked_spammers/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet address space long ago issued to San Francisco Bay Packet Radio, an organization that was involved way back in the 1970s in testing ARPANET, a predecessor to the global commercial Internet that we all use today. That organization was given the rights to do whatever it wanted with 134.17.0.0/16 address block. That entire swath of Internet space is now registered to an entity in Westminster, Colo., called SF Bay Packet Radio LLC, but except for a similar name, this company has no relation to San Francisco Bay Packet Radio... ? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ip_address_space_hijacked_spammers/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-30T11:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category><category>ip addressing</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Colorado Has a New Spam Law</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84308_colorado_new_spam_law/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84308_colorado_new_spam_law/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The governor of Colorado recently signed <a href="http://www.taugh.com/1178_enr.pdf">a new anti-spam law</a> [PDF] into effect. Since CAN SPAM draws a tight line around what states can do, this law is mostly interesting for the way that it pushes as firmly against that line as it can. <a href="http://bnablog.bna.com/techlaw/2008/02/colo-spam.html">Other observers</a> have already done a legal analysis of the way it's worded to avoid being tossed out as the Oklahoma law was in Mummagraphics, and to make it as easy as possible for suits to meet the falsity or deception limits in CAN SPAM. To me the most interesting part of this law is its one-way fee recovery language... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84308_colorado_new_spam_law/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-30T10:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Fun and Games In the ccTLD World</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84293_fun_and_games_cctld_world/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84293_fun_and_games_cctld_world/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There must be something in the air. I'm not sure exactly what it is, but there are a lot of things going on in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_code_top-level_domain">ccTLD world</a> at the moment. In the UK Nominet's Annual General Meeting (AGM) is being held this week. This would normally provoke a yawn from most people -- it's an AGM -- how exciting can that be? This year's AGM looks like it could be quite entertaining, although it probably isn't going to be particularly beneficial for its membership. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84293_fun_and_games_cctld_world/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-29T17:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>top-level domains</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>IPv6&#8230; Becoming a Hot Topic Again?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84288_ipv6_hot_topic_again/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84288_ipv6_hot_topic_again/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is IPv6 a hot topic again in the wake of the increased coverage of the looming IPv4 address depletion? This was the theme of a coffee break discussion we had at the recent <a href="http://www.menog.net/meetings/menog3/index.php">MENOG3</a> conference in Kuwait. With as many opinions as participants, I turned to "<a href="http://www.google.com/trends">Google Trend</a>" to help me get a better feel... Using <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=ipv6&ctab=0&geo=all&geor=all&date=all&sort=0">IPv6 as search word</a> and varying the time line indeed provided some interesting perspective and tidbits on when and where IPv6 seems to be or have been a hot topic indeed. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84288_ipv6_hot_topic_again/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-28T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>ipv6</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Brand Complementors: Implementing a Cooperative Domain&#45;Name Use</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The essay expands a <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/typosquatting_a_solution/">cooperative solution</a> to third-party use of brands in domain names. Like any approach that depends on cooperation, the solution will require both sides to change behavior but also allow both sides to take credit for the resulting benefits, i.e. a triangular solution. If not immediately addressed, the problem of third-party use can become a major threat to the industry. But we already know one thing: when it comes to this issue, legal action and bullying don't work. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-26T12:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domaining</category><category>legal issues</category><category>registrars</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Spam Turns 30</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/spam_turns_30/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/spam_turns_30/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Thirty years ago next week, Gary Thuerk, a marketer at the now-defunct computer firm Digital Equipment Corporation, sent an email to 393 users of Arpanet, the US government-run computer network that eventually became the internet. It was the first spam email ever. That commercial message, sent on 3 May 1978, drew a swift and negative reaction. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/spam_turns_30/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-25T12:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>anti-spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Top&#45;Level Domains .arpa, .org, and .uk Adopting DNSSEC</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/arpa_org_and_uk_adopting_dnssec/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/arpa_org_and_uk_adopting_dnssec/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet is slowly inching closer to ratcheting up the security of its Domain Name System (DNS) server architecture: The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN ) plans to go operational with DNSSEC later this year in one of its domains. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/arpa_org_and_uk_adopting_dnssec/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-04-25T12:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>dnssec</category>
	</item>


	</channel>
</rss>