Home / Blogs

Time for Reformation of the Internet

James Seng

An anonymous writer posted an article titled Time for Reformation of the Internet on Susan Crawford's blog. The article calls for a liberal approach towards ICANN, making a number of references to IETF and its process.

It's time for netizens to come to a similar realization about their direct relationship with the empowerment offered by the internet. None of the core principles that produced the net give any set of clerics — even the original engineers, or ISOC, much less ICANN — the right to prevent innovation at the edge. Indeed, the sacred texts of the net explicitly empower decentralized action. The internet arose because everything not prohibited was permitted.

This prompted a series of discussion in the blogosphere:

From Elliot Noss

Now some credit. I found "Time for Reformation of the Internet" to be well written and highly entertaining. I found many of the individual numbered points to be quite true. This, however, is what makes the document so misleading in my view. Take a number of powerful points and bury some fundamentally flawed underpinnings and you have a dangerous document.

From Susan Crawford

But even though I didn't write it, I don't agree with some of Elliot's criticisms of it. I do think that ICANN's "everything not permitted is prohibited" default setting is the wrong way to go. I don't think registries are monopolies — no more than any one car brand is a monopoly. Registries are competing — hard. I do think that the internet community can ban things if they want to, through consensus.

From James Seng

While I reject technical arguments like the "DNS can only support 20 gTLD", there are other reasons why it is a bad idea. Innovation ideas are like frogs' egg: a thousand hatched only one or two survive to maturity (quote Peter Drucker). Like many others, I love to have that one or two frogs but we aren't sure how to deal with the 999 other dead tadpoles. Particularly, how do we deal with the registrants who become dependent on the failed registries. "Oh too bad" is not an acceptable answer.

By James Seng, Assistant Director. Visit the blog maintained by James Seng here.

Related topics: DNS, ICANN, Top-Level Domains

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Top Level Domain Holdings Raises $14M for New gTLDs

.ORG COO Discusses Priorities With DailyVista, Pursuit of .NGO Domain

StarHub to Acquire '.starhub' New Top-Level Domain

ARI Registry Services Signs 21 Contracts in the First Week of New TLD Applications

MarkMonitor to Exhibit at Internet Tech Policy Exhibition and Reception to be Held on Capitol Hill

Sedari Signs With Dot Moscow Bidders

.ORG, The Public Interest Registry Welcomes Nancy Gofus As Chief Operating Officer

Minds+Machines Works with .bayern

The New Domain For Japan, JP.NET, Launches With Exclusive Invitation to Trademark Owners

Being a .PRO When Choosing a Registry Services Partner

UK Cabinet Office Looks to BlueCat Networks' Expertise and Best Practices for Securing PSN

Afilias Acquires Registry Services Corporation, .PRO

Thoughts on Applying for a Generic Top-Level Domain

Sedari Launches "Guess the Numbers Game" for New TLD Program

dot Brand Makes Its Debut: Afilias Advises Companies to Act Now for Successful TLD Applications

BlueCat Networks Helps Organizations Transition to IPv6 with HP

BlueCat Networks to Host Webinar on DNS, DHCP and IPAM Featuring Independent Research Firm

Facets of gTLD Registry Technical Operations - Registry Services

Technology and Finance Industries to Dominate New gTLD Applications

.CO Internet Selects Sedo to Broker Previously Unreleased .CO Domain Names

Hot Topics

Verisign

Security

Sponsored by
Verisign
dotMobi

Mobile

Sponsored by
dotMobi
Neustar UltraDNS

DNS

Sponsored by
Neustar UltraDNS
Minds + Machines

Top-Level Domains

Sponsored by
Minds + Machines
Afilias

DNSSEC

Sponsored by
Afilias