Home / Blogs

Register.com's Director of Policy Responds to WLS Issue

Register.com has not taken a position for or against WLS.  If and when the registry launches this service, Register.com will consider whether to offer it based on the price and conditions attached to the service.  We are committed to delivering to our customers the best in class services available.  Therefore, the registry's price will be an important factor.  Moreover, we are concerned about some of the conditions currently being considered by ICANN - primarily, the "black out period." This is a period of time prior to the final deletion of a name, during which a registrar would be prohibited from selling a WLS subscription on a domain name that it sponsors.  We consider this a condition that could confuse consumers and dampen domain name competition.

Just imagine, as a registrant, you are receiving announcements from your registrar regarding the need to renew your domain name.  At the same time, you may hear from another registrar or reseller, which you do not know, that they have placed a WLS subscription on your name.  Or, you may see these unfamiliar companies' ads or spam inviting WLS subscriptions on your name.  You cannot get the same protection from your own registrar.  In fact, your own registrar does not communicate to you about the situation.  This would bewilder and alarm your average registrant.

The registrars of record are unfairly disadvantaged as they will not be able to sell a WLS for a part of the domain name market.  This requirement would inadvertently create a disincentive to competition as the more domain names a registrar registers, the fewer WLS's it can sell.  Considering the potential difference in the prices of the two products, it may create a disincentive on domain name sales. 

It would be much better to address any concerns that a registrar may try to take advantage of its 'knowledge' of whether their domain names may be deleted with a marketing prohibition.  Simply do not allow registrars to claim any special knowledge, guarantee or access to the WLS subscriptions for the names they manage.  Solve the issue without creating unintended problems.

This provision should be addressed before Register.com would consider offering the WLS service to our customers.

By Elana Broitman, Director of Policy

Related topics: DNS, Domain Names, ICANN, Spam

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

Re: Register.com's Director of Policy Responds to WLS Issue Paul Stahura  –  Jul 22, 2003 1:39 PM PDT

Elana, you are correct, this is a major problem with WLS.  Therefore, to correct this problem and at the same time maintain a level playing field amongst registrars, the restriction should be modified so that no registrar can sell WLS on any name after a period that starts before the name expires (say 30 days) and ends the instant it becomes available again. 

A marketing prohibition will not work because it would necessitate that the accreditation agreements change and it would be difficult to enforce.  Plus the registrar could sell or use the information without marketing it.  So, even if there were a marketing prohibition, the advantage to some registrars over others would remain.  The goal is to completely remove the advantage, not mask it.

For more info see http://www.icannwatch.org/essays/icann-wls3c.doc

Paul Stahura
CEO
eNom, Inc.

PS even with this correction, other factors inherent in WLS will "bewilder and alarm your average registrant"

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Domain Registrars & Registries: Don't Say You Weren't Warned

EoWhy?

Perspectives on a DNS-CERT

"Thin Brand Line" Breaks as Canon Announces Plans for .CANON

EI, EI - NO!

Related News

Other Topics

Access Providers Broadband Censorship Cloud Computing Cyberattack Cybercrime Cybersquatting Data Center DNS DNSSEC Domain Names Domain Registries Email Enum ICANN Internet Governance Internet Protocol IP Addressing IPTV IPv6 Law Malware Mobile Multilinguism Net Neutrality P2P Policy & Regulation Privacy Regional Registries Security Spam Telecom Top-Level Domains VoIP Web White Space Whois Wireless

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

.ORG, The Public Interest Registry Celebrates Its 25th Year With 8 Million Registrations

MarkMonitor Year in Review Report: How Escalating Online Brand Abuse is Used to Monetize Web Traffic

.ORG: Introducing Fully Internationalized Domain Names

.ORG to Fully Deploy DNSSEC in June

The GLOBE Program Chooses Dyn Inc.'s Dynect Platform to Deploy DNSSEC per Federal OMB Mandate

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Nairobi

.ORG Registrations in 2009 Grew 8.4 Percent Over Previous Year

MarkMonitor Sets New Standard in Brand Protection with Site Staydown Service

Announcement: dotMobi Ownership

Afilias Limited Acquires .Mobi Domain Registry, Expands Market Leadership

ICANN and Cybersecurity: Hot Topics at The First Ever .ORG Forum

Using .ORG Directory to Find Haiti Relief Organizations

Neustar Releases UltraDNS Report Center

Afilias Releases .INFO Domain 2009 Annual Report

Expressions of Interest a Requirement for New gTLDs?

Neustar Implements DNS Security Extensions in the .US Registry

Paid Search Ads Can Lead to Fake Goods

Neustar Launches Initiative to Enhance DNS With Faster, More Secure Updates

Registry Stakeholder Group Comments on Latest ICANN Policies

Open Phishing Season