Broadband and Household Income

By Paul Budde
Paul Budde

Both broadband access and broadband speed positively affect household incomes, according to an analysis by Ericsson in conjunction with Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden.

This study is a continuation of earlier work by these partners on the impact of broadband. The earlier research concerned broadband's effects on the gross domestic product of entire countries; this study, "Socioeconomic Effects of Broadband Speed: a Microeconomic Investigation," examines the effects on individual households.

The researchers found that household benefits don't increase smoothly along with broadband speed. Instead, they rise in steps, and a minimum speed level is required to make any difference at all. This minimum level is itself likely to rise over time.

The study also found:

The impact of broadband on income

By comparing certain countries with varying economic characteristics, the study asked whether having access to broadband is enough to make an impact or whether faster broadband is the way to significantly increase income.

The study analysed data from eight OECD countries (U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Japan and the U.S.) as well as from Brazil, India and China (BIC), investigating the similarities and differences between them. It measured the impact of broadband speed on household income by analysing whether leveraging the benefits of faster broadband can improve competitiveness in the labour market.

Survey data from Ericsson ConsumerLab was the most important source for the study. The researchers used statistical regression analysis to investigate the impact of broadband speed on household income. They also accounted for other relevant factors that might affect household income levels, such as education, skills and socioeconomic variables.

The U.S., Japan, the U.K. and Sweden all have high levels of household income and high broadband speeds. Brazil, India and China, together with Mexico and South Africa had lower broadband speeds and lower income levels.

This observation suggests that higher broadband speeds contribute to higher income levels, but could equally indicate that countries with higher income levels can afford better broadband, so the researchers had to conduct further analysis to rule out that possibility.

The study supports previous research that found the most advanced countries gain the greatest total benefit from broadband and that they can quickly move toward highly innovative markets and improve labour productivity.

The ability of the most advanced countries to leverage higher broadband speeds is enabled by a richer service offering related to both work and private life and a higher level of technology maturity among enterprises and public institutions.

The researchers found that the minimum effective speed is at least 2 Mbps for OECD countries, and the greatest expected increase in income occurs when households go from having no broadband to 4 Mbps, gaining around $2,100 per household per year, or $182 per month.

For the non-OECD countries, the threshold level seems to be at or below 0.5 Mbps. An additional annual household income of around $800, or $70 per month, is expected to be gained by introducing a 0.5 Mbps broadband connection in these countries.

Why broadband speed increases income

Households benefit from increased broadband speed in several ways. Access to advanced services, such as videoconferencing, boosts personal productivity and allows more flexible work arrangements through teleworking and telecommuting.

As overall broadband penetration increases, households without broadband or with slow broadband at home will find staying competitive in the labour market more difficult. In effect, they need faster broadband just to maintain their place in the economy.

By Paul Budde, Managing Director of Paul Budde Communication. Paul is also a contributor of the Paul Budde Communication blog located here.

Related topics: Broadband


Paul,I am not sure that boosting personal Alex Tajirian  –  Jan 16, 2014 12:37 PM PST

I am not sure that boosting personal productivity and allowing more flexible work arrangements necessarily increases household income. What if the households substitute work time for leisure, i.e., they decide to work less? Thus, increased productivity in a corporate world does not necessarily have the same consequences on household income.

What am I missing?

Thx Alex,I think it is a bit Paul Budde  –  Jan 16, 2014 1:19 PM PST

Thx Alex,

I think it is a bit more complex than simply income increases. With the Internet people have the opportunity to compare prices and buy cheaper a 2009 UK survey did find that this could mean a saving of $100 per month. Looking broader internationally. The Internet takes the middlemen away and provides a much bigger market for people in developing economies. Access to information, education, etc also increases the opportunity for higher paid job and again the Internet allows you to look for those jobs.

Should it then be “purchasing power” instead Alex Tajirian  –  Jan 16, 2014 1:41 PM PST

Should it then be “purchasing power” instead of income?

Alex,If you have the time pls read Paul Budde  –  Jan 16, 2014 3:09 PM PST


If you have the time pls read the Ericsson document in a bit more detail they provide more examples and further insights into this matter


Thanks Paul Alex Tajirian  –  Jan 17, 2014 12:52 AM PST

Thanks Paul