Is the Future of the Internet at Risk?

By Paul Budde
Paul Budde

The debate about the control of the internet is intensifying, with interesting discussions expected later on this year in Dubai at the WCIT conference organised by the ITU.

Over the last 25 years the industry has moved from being mainly telephony-based to being mainly IP-based, and many say that what is now at stake is the future of the internet as we know it at this point in time.

On the one hand we were lucky that the internet in its current format was invented by academics and innovative independent entrepreneurs rather than by governments and the vested commercial interests. Furthermore, the various elements of the internet are built by private companies and as such are also owned by them — very little 'internet ownership' is in the hands of governments. The internet would never have been developed if it had been left to governments, telcos or the international institutions around them.

The reality now is that the political stakes of the internet have risen significantly. On the one side there are the community forces that would like to keep it free, as in free of (excessive) government interference; while on the other side there are the conservative and less democratic forces who want to see more control over the internet — with the clear undercurrent that they want to limit the (perceived or real) control of the internet held by the USA.

In this politically charged environment there are several forces at work in and around the internet:

So, in looking at the future of the internet, and to establish whether the current political interference in it puts the internet at risk, we have to unravel these issues, since in many cases they have been deliberately interwoven in order to disguise hidden agendas or other underlying issues. There are a range of interests at play here; they include: the internet community, American interests, commercial interests, other developed economies, developing economies and international institutions.

A positive outcome of these discussions could be to look at the internet community and see how these organisations can be used to play more of a leadership role. Once the internet community organisation is properly funded and stocked with the right international people to manage what is needed to watch over internet governance it will be an excellent partner in the broader community of international organisations.

There could be arrangements that, for example, could see organisations such as UN, UNESCO, ITU, WTO, WIPO and others to either become directly involved in, or affiliated with, the internet body, and they could work together to address the many different elements involved in internet governance, including issues around copyright, privacy, child pornography, cyber crime, cyber warfare and so on.

Within such an environment it is also possible to untangle the debate and assess:

Most issues do not require international consensus, and processes that do require it should be kept to a minimum anyway. But the overarching aim should be to keep the internet as free as possible within the international fabric that it has created around it.

By Paul Budde, Managing Director of Paul Budde Communication. Paul is also a contributor of the Paul Budde Communication blog located here.

Related topics: Access Providers, Censorship, Internet Governance, Policy & Regulation


Tactfully vague Jeremy Malcolm  –  Jul 01, 2012 6:14 PM PST

"Once the internet community organisation is properly funded and stocked with the right international people to manage what is needed to watch over internet governance it will be an excellent partner in the broader community of international organisations." It is good to hear a respected industry analyst with saying this, in addition to the south-based NGOs and academics, because we are screamed down when we come out with anything similar.  Even so, what you propose will not fly for some time yet.  As usual you are ahead of the curve.

Frustrating Paul Budde  –  Jul 01, 2012 6:29 PM PST

It is frustrating Jeremy that you can see a rather easy solution but that it seems to be impossible to make that happen. I have been talking with industry leaders for close to two years - as I could see a disaster looming - but there has not been any leadership provided by the leading digital economy companies. Sometimes I wonder that they might have a hidden agenda and are quite happy with government intervention. If you look at all industry that are regulated (eg telecoms) you see that the incumbents/monopolist thrive on such environments with their armies of lawyers while the users are the victims because of high prices, anti competitive behavior and a slow down of innovation.

Follow-up Jeremy Malcolm  –  Jul 04, 2012 6:21 AM PST

Thanks for your reply Paul.  I have followed up with this blog post, which references yours, and which I hope you'll find interesting.

Excellent Jeremy I have also passed your Paul Budde  –  Jul 04, 2012 3:23 PM PST

Excellent Jeremy I have also passed your blog on to others involved in the discussion.