Home / News

Google Beats Facebook in Popularity Because it Supports More Languages (For Now)

John Yunker co-founder of Byte Level Research and author of The Web Globalization Report Card writes: "The big story this year is that Facebook and Google finished in a numerical tie. But because Google supports more languages (for now), it edged out as the winner. ... Even as we look across all 225 web sites, the number of languages continues to increase. Although the rate of language growth slowed over the past two years — due in large part to the global recession — growth continues. This year, the average number of languages increased to 22, up from 20 languages in 2008."

By CircleID Reporter – CircleID's internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us. Visit Page

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

"Although the rate of language growth slowed By James Riso  –  Mar 03, 2010 2:46 pm PDT

"Although the rate of language growth slowed over the past two years—due in large part to the global recession—growth continues"

Why bring the recession into this?  The primary reason strikes me as common sense.  Companies will cover the most popular languages first, so after ~22 languages, we're talking about very diminished returns to marginal translations (Wiki has some ballpark figures).  For many, the growth in potential audience is probably not worth the investment.

I don't disagree that there aren't diminished By John Yunker  –  Mar 03, 2010 4:30 pm PDT

I don't disagree that there aren't diminished returns when you get past 22 languages — in both audience and revenues — but there are still plenty of opportunities. And if you manage your translation budget well, there's no reason companies can't achieve a positive ROI from supporting 30+ languages.

Thanks for the reply. I guess By James Riso  –  Mar 03, 2010 7:04 pm PDT

Thanks for the reply.  I guess I was more worried by your observation that "the rate of language growth slowed" when that struck me as natural.  It makes sense to me now that you're be commenting on the effects on top of base expectations.  Interesting stuff.

And you're absolutely right that there is By John Yunker  –  Mar 03, 2010 8:22 pm PDT

And you're absolutely right that there is a "language curve" that companies progress along as they expand globally. In the early part of that curve, a company may add 3-5 languages per year and then this will taper as they get move up the curve. There are exceptions, like Facebook, which banged out 70 languages in two years, but clearly an exception. So I'll revisit the wording of my blog to make this clearer. Thanks James.

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.

Related

Topics

Cybercrime

Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias

Whois

Sponsored byWhoisXML API