Home / News

Bruce Schneier: Government and Industry Have Betrayed the Internet, and Us

Bruce Schneier in an op-ed piece published in the Guardian on Thursday writes: “Government and industry have betrayed the internet, and us. By subverting the internet at every level to make it a vast, multi-layered and robust surveillance platform, the NSA has undermined a fundamental social contract. The companies that build and manage our internet infrastructure, the companies that create and sell us our hardware and software, or the companies that host our data: we can no longer trust them to be ethical internet stewards. This is not the internet the world needs, or the internet its creators envisioned. We need to take it back.”

By CircleID Reporter

CircleID’s internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us.

Visit Page

Filed Under

Comments

Taking Back Tthe Inernet Frederick Harris  –  Sep 10, 2013 8:45 PM

Bruce has identified a huge and maybe intractable problem. Intractable means internet can’t be taken back because it can’t be uninvented. We see here unintended consequences when governments, meaning in this instance U.S. Commerce Department (NTIA),created an impossible-to-adequately-oversee regulatory model.

It is chaos! And, for that reason, internet governance will continue to be chaotic until the web fails completely. One can not regulate trust.

At that point, sooner perhaps rather than later, questions will again be asked about a governance model which was transformed by U.S. government, compromised by an absurd regulatory model (ICANN); and, now, completely upended by government because a model that nobody (in their right mind) trusts is unworkable.

What to do? Nothing can be done. The Internet is a mess. There will be huge financial losses all around. Internet likely will muddle through for some years until it collapses entirely. Possibly (probably?) one or more private entities will try to split off from the internet by creating private versions.

At that point, world public opinion will perhaps demand that the U.S. government a) dissolve ICANN entirely, b) get out of the way, c) let the internet community go back to the drawing board and d) hope that next time around a regulatory model reinforced by appropriate security standards, will emerge.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign