Home / Blogs

How Much Money Is There in Complaining?

Although I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the trademark lawyers’ argument that trademark holders need to register .sucks domains cheaply before anyone else can, there is one point at the end of their letter that’s worth a look.

The registry contract for .sucks, between Vox Populi and ICANN, has this sentence that appears (as far as I know) in no other registry contract, in the section on Registry-Level fees:

In addition, Registry Operator shall also pay ICANN (i) a one-time fixed registry access fee of US$100,000 as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, and (ii) a registry administration fee of US$1.00 for each of the first 900,000 Transactions.

This in in addition to the $25,000/yr that every other registry pays. While I doubt that there will be 900,000 transactions (domain registration-years) anytime in the forseeable future, it’s still a significant chunk of money paid to ICANN for no observable reason. Since ICANN assures us they have a proven commitment to accountability and transparency in all of its practices, it’s baffling that they haven’t explained what ICANN is giving to Vox Populi in return for all that extra money.

Finally, Vox Populi beat out two other applicants for .sucks in a private auction in which they reportedly paid $3 million, which does make one wonder exactly what the business plan is. They’d need 10,000 registrations at the $300 list price to make back the $3 mil, which seems pretty optimistic, unless they figure the trademark owners will grab them all even if they don’t pay the $2500 sunrise price. Perhaps they believe claims that they’ll create a dialog and improve customer service, like they said when they planned to charge $25K for sunrise registrations. Or maybe not.

By John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker

Filed Under

Comments

"no observable reason" John Berryhill  –  Apr 15, 2015 3:31 PM

Whether a reason is “observable” is apparently a function of where one does one’s observing.

One way to observe, is to ask.  And when asked, as quoted two weeks ago on DomainIncite, ICANN has stated:

“Some affiliates of Momentous, the majority owners of Vox Populi Registry, had previously defaulted on substantial payments to ICANN. Given this previous experience, ICANN negotiated special contract provisions in the Vox Populi Registry Agreement to provide additional financial assurances. Those provisions were added solely for that reason and were not related to the nature of this specific TLD.”

Transparent? John Levine  –  Apr 15, 2015 3:33 PM

That may well be true, but it ain't very transparent.

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API