Home / Blogs

Leveraging Traffic Statistics to Manage Corporate Domain Portfolios

Elisa Cooper

Corporate domain name portfolios often consist of domain names that do not resolve to relevant content. In fact, it's not uncommon for less than half of corporate domains to point to live content. Sure there are domains such as those that point to "sucks" sites or those registered anonymously for future use that purposely do not resolve, but those are the exception to the rule. Most domains that do not resolve were registered defensively or acquired via acquisition — without much thought given to where the domains should actually point.

The best practice is to ensure that all non-core domains point to relevant content. Using domain forwarding, which is a common feature provided by corporate registrars, is a quick and easy way to accomplish this. It allows corporations to view historical traffic statistics to understand whether the name is being visited and should be renewed. Of course, for domains that do not appear to point to content, it is critical to understand whether DNS records such as MX records exist, before updating nameservers to support domain forwarding. Just because a domain does not appear to resolve, does not mean that it is not being used for mail or for some other internal application.

A common question that is asked, is often around how much traffic should a domain receive in order for it to be considered valuable? Of course, that depends. Raw numbers can be useful, but tracking conversion rates provides powerful evidence for understanding the value of a domain.

So if a domain does not receive any traffic, should it be allowed to lapse? While traffic is a good place to start when paring a portfolio, there are still a number of other factors to consider before lapsing any domain including whether DNS records exist, the domain was previously recovered, it supports an existing brand, it has inherent value, and the brand owner has cleared the name for expiration. However, the most important question to ask is if the domain were to be reregistered by a squatter, would that be OK?

While traffic is not the only measure by which to value the importance of a domain, it certainly can be helpful in making renewal decisions, and when determining what to lapse, it is a logical place to start.

By Elisa Cooper, SVP Marketing and Policy at Brandsight, Inc.
Follow CircleID on
SHARE THIS POST

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Question on error pages Jean Guillon  –  Jun 13, 2018 11:11 PM PST

Why many major companies with large domain name portfolio keep some of their domain names pointing to error pages when they could point them to their front page (for example)?

Good question... Elisa Cooper  –  Jun 14, 2018 7:15 AM PST

I think many companies don't have the ability to quickly see which domains aren't resolving or have errors, and for them redirecting domains to relevant content can be a time-consuming process.

Role of the Registrar Jean Guillon  –  Jun 14, 2018 8:52 AM PST

Isn't it the role of the registrar to educate a client about the impact of such errors (on image for example) and offer a solution?

Jean raises an interesting food for thought. Alex Tajirian  –  Jun 14, 2018 11:29 AM PST

Jean raises an interesting food for thought. If Elisa’s conjecture that a lot of corporate domain owners are clueless and/or unsophisticated to recognize the role of domain names, Huston we have a problem. Why hasn’t anyone come up with a service to capitalize on this anomaly? Maybe MarkMonitor doesn’t think that it’s a viable business.

Absolutely! No doubt about it! Elisa Cooper  –  Jun 14, 2018 8:54 AM PST

Absolutely! No doubt about it!

Not sure what the post’s value proposition Alex Tajirian  –  Jun 14, 2018 11:26 AM PST

Not sure what the post’s value proposition is?

Agree Alex Tajirian  –  Jun 14, 2018 11:30 AM PST

Agree

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related

Topics

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign