Home / Blogs

Now Begins the Third Stage of ICANN's TLD Triathlon

Steve DelBianco

The ICANN community here in Singapore is celebrating after the historic vote to expand top-level domains (TLDs). And while I wouldn't begrudge anyone a few Singapore Slings, I think it's a little early to start celebrating. The marathon effort ICANN began 5 years ago isn't even close to reaching the finish line.

Actually, marathon is probably the wrong analogy. Try this:

A month from now, our host city of Singapore will welcome competitors to the 10th International Triathlon. What makes a triathlon so uniquely challenging is that after you complete a grueling swim and punishing bike race, you still have the hardest stage ahead of you: a long-distance run.

That's where the ICANN community is now — just off the starting line for the longest and hardest stage of the race. How we run this stage will determine whether or not new TLDs succeed from the standpoint of the stakeholder groups that really matter: domain registrants and Internet users.

The first stage of the TLD triathlon — the open-water swim — was a painstaking, community-driven policy development process that took the better part of five years. It had all the feeling of a swim in the open sea, requiring constant movement without much forward progress. But we eventually stumbled onto the beach only to begin an unexpectedly contentious stage two.

The second stage of the TLD triathlon — the bike race — was the ICANN Board's six-month saga of high-pressure, high-stakes negotiations with the Government Advisory Committee. Like a bike race, it was fast and dangerous, putting at risk everything that was accomplished in the prior stage. Monday's 13-1 vote in favor of TLD expansion was like the race stage, where you feel grateful just for having survived.

That brought us to what I and several board members called "the end of the beginning”. Now ICANN faces stage three: the long-haul work of implementing the most ambitious undertaking yet.

This next stage is no victory lap. The global Internet community — including many stakeholders who weren't satisfied with the outcome of the policy development process — will be watching ICANN's every move to find an excuse to supplant its multi-stakeholder model with traditional multi-government models like the UN.

ICANN board resolution leaves enough unfinished business for stakeholders to spend the next year tweaking the "final" guidebook, even as ICANN's foot-weary staff does the difficult work of putting it into effect.

During this stage of the race, ICANN must uphold its signature commitments to accountability and transparency. As the process evolves in keeping with today's resolution, ICANN must also uphold the multistakeholder model and avoid any closed-door, staff-driven shortcuts that might seem expedient as the running gets harder.

Given the timeline approved this week, we're likely to see our first new gTLDs sometime in 2013. If we all start running now, we can finish the TLD Triathlon and throw a real party — in about two years.

By Steve DelBianco, Executive Director at NetChoice. More blog posts from Steve DelBianco can also be read here.

Related topics: DNS, Domain Names, ICANN, Internet Governance, Policy & Regulation, Top-Level Domains

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

You just don't give up, Steve! Steve Goldstein  –  Jun 21, 2011 12:32 PM PST

More FUD, Steve!  In your recent House testimony, you counseled "Mind the GAC," a play on words of the London Tube's "Mind the gap!". Might I very indelicately suggest that you mind something else ending in "-ap?"

I would expect that, if not harried by last ditch attempts to round up compliant Congress-critters or other governmental officials in order to delay the process further, ICANN will proceed with dispatch to honor all its obligations for implementing new gTLDs.  Spreading FUD, however subtly, just doesn't help.

--Steve G.

Don't forget the year 2000 applicants Karl Auerbach  –  Jun 21, 2011 3:37 PM PST

There are 40 applications that are still pending from year 2000.  Those people paid their application fee ($50,000 each) and ICANN did not refuse them but, rather, told them to wait - and they are still waiting.

Simply refunding the application fee or giving a discount on a new application is *not* an appropriate resolution.

Rather those applicants deserve to have their applications handled, and handled according to the rules that were in place when they filed those applications and paid their money.

At least one of those applicants - for .web - was operational pending their application and had customers (I was among them) here in California.  (I have had a website operating under my name in .web since before year 2000.)

So those who aspire for .web - should be aware that there is an existing .web registry here in California and that anyone who aspires to .web TLD might find themselves precluded from operating in California because there is an established business registering under the name .web that has more than a decade of priority.

(I have no relationship to the .web people except as a long time customer, but I do dislike watching them - and my existing name registration in .web - get royally scrod.)

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Domain Name .Africa Faces Hurdles - Q&A with Sophia Bekele

Join Paul Vixie & Robert Edmonds at the Upcoming Distinguished Speaker Series

LogicBoxes Announces Automation Solutions for ccTLD

List of New gTLD Availability & Key Information Provided for Download

Radix Launches .Space for Individuals, Freelancers and Professionals

TLD Registry Wins Best Marketing Award at China New gTLD Roadshow

Public Interest Registry Introduces 'OnGood' - New Brand Identity for .ngo & .ong

Victorian Government and City of Melbourne Launch .melbourne Web Addresses

Update on Minds + Machines' Top-Level Domain Launches

ICANN Los Angeles Recap Webinar

TLD Registry Appoints First China General Manager, Mr Jin Wang

TLD Registry Opens China Headquarters in "China's Silicon Valley"

.nyc Goes Public to Brand the Big Apple

pink.host: Breast Cancer Awareness by Bluehost

3 Questions to Ask Your DNS Host About DDoS

Introducing Our Special Edition Managed DNS Service for Top-Level Domain Operators

Afilias Director Wins ICANN's 2014 Leadership Award

Radix Announces the Addition of .tech to Its Portfolio

Afilias Partners With Internet Society to Sponsor Deploy360 ION Conference Series Through 2016

Infographic: Where in the World Do Chinese People Live?

Sponsored Topics

Minds + Machines

Top-Level Domains

Sponsored by
Minds + Machines
Verisign

Security

Sponsored by
Verisign
Afilias

DNSSEC

Sponsored by
Afilias
dotMobi

Mobile

Sponsored by
dotMobi