CircleID

Comments

Shambles at the .Pro Registry

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 6:09 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  I guess double oops is in order.  I do see where Tina Dam had provided a link to her letter on the ICANN site.

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 6:04 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  oops, here is the link to show Tina Dam and her affiliation with ICANN: http://www.icann.org/biog/dam.htm

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 6:01 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  Richard, You must really think internet consumers are this gulliable.  For one, who are the "named" persons you say made comments at the Public Forum yesterday.  Also who is the Registrar who lodged that "fierce" complaint.  Facts Richard, your story…

Spirit of .Pro, Where Art Thou?

• Comment posted Mar 30, 2005 6:01 am PST — by Gregory Krajewski
  I would personally like to thank Tom Barrett for being as agressive as he has been trying to explain Encirca's ProForwarding service.  Many people would like to see Encirca's new service fail, and for the life of me I do…

Why Restricted TLDs Should Not Be Gatecrashed

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 10:57 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  All I ask Richard is that when we discuss these important issues we provide links to "quotes" if we are "using" them, or have the person make their own determination as to how they feel on the subject. Too many…

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 8:20 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  FYI:  This time I took a screenshot of my post

• Comment posted Apr 08, 2005 8:17 pm PDT — by Gregory Krajewski
  Richard, You must really think internet consumers are this gulliable. For one, who are the "named" persons you say made comments at the Public Forum yesterday. Also who is the Registrar who lodged that "fierce" complaint. Facts Richard, your story…

• Comment posted Apr 01, 2005 5:51 pm PST — by Gregory Krajewski
  Just a couple of comments: 1) The bottom-up, consensus process that drives ICANN decisions are usually occurs in situations which directly effects the DNS.  I believe what Encirca has done with their ProForwarding™ service does not in any way "alter" the agreement RegistryPro signed with ICANN, nor does it "change" the way the DNS is utilized.  Let's be clear on this because it is important to the whole process.  If every time a registrar or registry wants to introduce a new service they were required to beat down every "internet community" organization for their approval we would have "stagnation" at the highest levels.  DO NOT CONFUSE ALTERING THE DNS (APPROVING A NEW TLD, etc) WITH ADDING A NEW SERVICE THAT ADHERES TO CONTRACTS IN PLACE. 2) My 2nd point has to do with the suggestion that ICANN approve "multiple" restricted TLDs. Bad idea.  Reason:  Restrictive practices inherently drive up costs, which ultimately puts the average internet user on the "other side" of the internet divide. 

• Comment posted Mar 31, 2005 6:27 am PST — by Gregory Krajewski
  Once again Richard you fail to see that "nothing" has changed with how dot pro is being utilized.  Dot pro is still a restricted domain.  You still need two 3rd level domains to buy a 2nd level pro domain.  Which…